In recent months there have been bad news about the press on paper. In the English case and noticed the disappearance of a magazine perhaps not very popular but of great weight, a small symptom. however, about the same time alarming news arrived: the traditional daily newspaper, the paper began to show alarming signs of collapse. It was no longer down the number of readers or advertisers. And so we learn that closed a newspaper U.S. nearly 150 years. Or how the French government would take steps to promote newspaper reading among young people.
Apparently, the press announced the death of the paper is due to the "digital." These are two different formats. In my view the digital may have the advantage on paper in its immediacy and its nature (for now) free. But no way I look alike.
a newspaper for me has always been something more than news. For articles of opinion, because of its format, for its usability, for its smell, for me "houses" during the rides, because I can score and cut ...
I can say is that most of it I can do with digital media, but not the same. Without returning to talk about smells or touches any way is just as comfortable reading the writing on a computer screen than paper. The role is not only better physically (for the hearing and the rest of the body) but also for content: it lends itself more to the review, reflection, thought ... The digital is determined by the medium itself: it has the advantage of be faster, more multimedia, more interactive and therefore more given the speed (the quantity that dominates) than to the quality and quietness (assimilate, analyze, submit to criticism ...)
against me also may invoke the benefits "visual" of digital newspapers. But we must not lose sight of Prehistory was the era of the rule of the "audiovisual."
0 comments:
Post a Comment